🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking followers recognizing you as a thought leader? Do numerous respondents applauding your advice on expanding your venture? Are headhunters making contact to discuss opportunities?

If not, the explanation could be your gender.

The Test: Modifying Gender Identity for Increased Reach

Dozens of women participated in an organized professional network test recently following viral posts suggested that switching their gender to "man" enhanced their platform visibility.

Some participants modified their profiles to include what they called "masculine-oriented" terminology - adding action-focused professional jargon like "propel", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their exposure similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Questions Raised

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether a built-in gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes men who employ professional networking terminology.

Like many large social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to determine which posts appear to which members - boosting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the trend but claimed it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when deciding post visibility. Instead, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" affect how content are received.

Changing gender in your settings does not influence how your content shows up in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who changed her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "a masculine version", reported remarkable results.

"The numbers I'm seeing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a 1,300% increase in content views," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, started testing after noticing her reach decline significantly.

The Method

• First, she modified her gender to "male"
• Then, she used AI tools to rewrite her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Lastly, she recycled previous content with comparable "assertive" style

The result was immediate: a 415% increase in visibility within seven days.

The Downside

Although the positive results, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the approach.

"Before, my content were softer - concise and insightful, but also warm and relatable," she explained. "Now, the masculine version was assertive and self-assured - like a white male swaggering around."

She abandoned the test after one week, stating "Each day I continued, and results improved, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Not all testers experienced favorable outcomes. Cass Cooper who modified both her profile gender to "male" and her race to "Caucasian" reported a reduction in reach and engagement.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it functions in particular situations or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These experiments coincide with ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's unique position as both a professional network and social space.

Recent changes in recent months have reportedly caused women professionals experiencing significantly reduced visibility, leading to informal experiments where identical content by men and women received dramatically unequal reach.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to categorize and spread posts based on various elements, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company claims it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson suggested that recent declines in some users' reach might stem from increased competition due to additional posts on the platform.

Evolving Environment

As one participant noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she commented. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."